Skip to content
Success

Changes

Summary

  1. Updated test path that I changed incorrectly earlier (details)
  2. I altered the w_up_in_cloud and w_down_in_cloud code so that a (details)
Commit 2a7accdc7ebd649234190d1f320cad45145faae1 by cernikt
Updated test path that I changed incorrectly earlier
The file was modified WRF/scripts/WRF_Parallel_test.sh (diff)
Commit a7de6b09f4f0e09b48f663e2432b3e98b29bfe60 by bmg2
I altered the w_up_in_cloud and w_down_in_cloud code so that a
thresholding is used similar to what is seen in the cloud fraction
and cloud water code.  If the PDF component mean of w more than
the maximum allow number of standard deviations away from 0, the
PDF component is either all-updrafty or all-downdrafty, and the
code avoids expensive computations where large magnitude values
can potentially be fed into ERF or EXP.

Of course, the results are not bit-for-bit with the previous version,
meaning that there are some situations where these thresholds come
into effect.  However, plots of all cases show no visible differences
in w_up_in_cloud and w_down_in_cloud.

Since w_up_in_cloud and w_down_in_cloud are not included in normal
stats output, this commit does not change the bit-for-bitness of
CLUBB code.
The file was modified pdf_closure_module.F90 (diff)