Started by an SCM change32026203b457294d1be5a16ee364e847d65c44605a026203b457294d1be5a16ee364e847d65c44605arefs/remotes/origin/master026203b457294d1be5a16ee364e847d65c44605a026203b457294d1be5a16ee364e847d65c44605arefs/remotes/origin/master026203b457294d1be5a16ee364e847d65c44605a026203b457294d1be5a16ee364e847d65c44605arefs/remotes/origin/masterhttps://github.com/larson-group/clubb.gitfalse#3213276072690664clubb_release_intel_build #3232false322177SUCCESS1614765067382http://carson.math.uwm.edu/jenkins/view/all/job/clubb_release_intel_build/32/postprocessing/check_budgets_balance/checkBudget.py026203b457294d1be5a16ee364e847d65c44605a1614699548000http://carson.math.uwm.edu/jenkins/user/noreplynoreplynoreply@github.comUpdate checkBudget.py Minor edit to ensure the nightly budget test works correctly. Without the "?", the re.match function is "greedy", meaning it looks for all instances of the underscore character "_". This is problematic for the "wp3_pr_turb" budget term for the wp3 budget. Adding the "?" ensures that it will only search up to the first instance of the underscore, as intended. I tested this and the budgets now balance successfully. 2021-03-02 09:39:08 -0600026203b457294d1be5a16ee364e847d65c44605aUpdate checkBudget.pyeditpostprocessing/check_budgets_balance/checkBudget.pygithttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/jenkins/user/noreplynoreplyfalse33http://carson.math.uwm.edu/jenkins/view/all/job/clubb_release_intel_build/33/31http://carson.math.uwm.edu/jenkins/view/all/job/clubb_release_intel_build/31/