Started by user cerniktcerniktcernikt1468ce3e98cd6260bddeae905311e9fa64c832dbf008ce3e98cd6260bddeae905311e9fa64c832dbf00refs/remotes/origin/master8ce3e98cd6260bddeae905311e9fa64c832dbf008ce3e98cd6260bddeae905311e9fa64c832dbf00refs/remotes/origin/master8ce3e98cd6260bddeae905311e9fa64c832dbf008ce3e98cd6260bddeae905311e9fa64c832dbf00refs/remotes/origin/masterhttps://github.com/larson-group/clubb.gitfalse#146769628596301clubb_timestep_gfortran_tests #146146false14617733SUCCESS1660828694531http://carson.math.uwm.edu/jenkins/job/clubb_timestep_gfortran_tests/146/src/CLUBB_core/pdf_closure_module.F908ce3e98cd6260bddeae905311e9fa64c832dbf001660756368000http://carson.math.uwm.edu/jenkins/user/bmg2bmg2bmg2@uwm.eduI have optimized the new w_up_in_cloud and w_down_in_cloud code by only doing repeated operations one time and then saving them as a local variable. Since the numerical order of operations changes for the argument to the EXP term, the results will differ at the level of numerical round-off, making this revision not bit-for-bit with the last revision. This only affects the w_up_in_cloud and w_down_in_cloud statistical output variables, which in turn are not output as part of standard_stats.in. 2022-08-17 12:12:48 -05008ce3e98cd6260bddeae905311e9fa64c832dbf00I have optimized the new w_up_in_cloud and w_down_in_cloud code byeditsrc/CLUBB_core/pdf_closure_module.F90githttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/jenkins/user/bmg2bmg2false147http://carson.math.uwm.edu/jenkins/job/clubb_timestep_gfortran_tests/147/145http://carson.math.uwm.edu/jenkins/job/clubb_timestep_gfortran_tests/145/